Talk:Schemas/NIST-ITL
From Code Synthesis Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 17:08, 31 March 2009 Fuhrmanator (Talk | contribs) (Question about version(s) of XercesC++) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 20:04, 31 March 2009 Boris (Talk | contribs) (→Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin?) Next diff → |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin? == | == Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin? == | ||
I am trying to build it under Cygwin, and I'm not sure which version of XercesC++ needs to be installed. You mention that 3.0.x behaves differently than previous versions, but it's not clear which one I need to have to make the sample files work. Can you clarify? | I am trying to build it under Cygwin, and I'm not sure which version of XercesC++ needs to be installed. You mention that 3.0.x behaves differently than previous versions, but it's not clear which one I need to have to make the sample files work. Can you clarify? | ||
+ | |||
+ | With the proposed fix to the schema, both Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 and 3.0.x should work. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Boris|Boris]] 16:04, 31 March 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:04, 31 March 2009
Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin?
I am trying to build it under Cygwin, and I'm not sure which version of XercesC++ needs to be installed. You mention that 3.0.x behaves differently than previous versions, but it's not clear which one I need to have to make the sample files work. Can you clarify?
With the proposed fix to the schema, both Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 and 3.0.x should work.
Boris 16:04, 31 March 2009 (EDT)