Talk:Schemas/NIST-ITL

From Code Synthesis Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:04, 31 March 2009
Boris (Talk | contribs)
(Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin?)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 22:57, 1 April 2009
Fuhrmanator (Talk | contribs)
(post-posting added signature)
Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin? == == Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin? ==
I am trying to build it under Cygwin, and I'm not sure which version of XercesC++ needs to be installed. You mention that 3.0.x behaves differently than previous versions, but it's not clear which one I need to have to make the sample files work. Can you clarify? I am trying to build it under Cygwin, and I'm not sure which version of XercesC++ needs to be installed. You mention that 3.0.x behaves differently than previous versions, but it's not clear which one I need to have to make the sample files work. Can you clarify?
 +
 +[[User:Fuhrmanator|Fuhrmanator]] 18:57, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
With the proposed fix to the schema, both Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 and 3.0.x should work. With the proposed fix to the schema, both Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 and 3.0.x should work.
[[User:Boris|Boris]] 16:04, 31 March 2009 (EDT) [[User:Boris|Boris]] 16:04, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:57, 1 April 2009

Version(s) of XercesC++ for the sample to run under Cygwin?

I am trying to build it under Cygwin, and I'm not sure which version of XercesC++ needs to be installed. You mention that 3.0.x behaves differently than previous versions, but it's not clear which one I need to have to make the sample files work. Can you clarify?

Fuhrmanator 18:57, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

With the proposed fix to the schema, both Xerces-C++ 2.8.0 and 3.0.x should work.

Boris 16:04, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Personal tools